Which of the following can be considered a terroristic threat?

A terroristic threat is generally defined as a statement made with the intent to terrorize another individual or substantial group of individuals, to cause evacuation of a building, or to cause serious public inconvenience. When one threatens property damage with intent, it demonstrates a clear and specific intention to instill fear or panic, which aligns with the legal definition of a terroristic threat.

In this scenario, the threat of property damage suggests a potential act that can have dire consequences and elicits a fear for safety, making it a suitable example of what constitutes a terroristic threat. Such threats often result in serious responses from law enforcement due to the implications involved.

The other options do not meet the criteria for a terroristic threat. Verbal arguments without aggression lack the necessary intent to terrorize or incite fear. Non-specific threats do not convey a clear target or act, thereby failing to demonstrate an intentionality that would qualify it as terroristic. Complaining about a situation does not involve a threat to safety or property, making it irrelevant in this context.